Add `upvalue` semantic token modifier

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

LuaLS should expose whether a `variable` reference is an upvalue through a new `upvalue` semantic token modifier.

Currently, local variables and upvalues are both reported as:

```text
semantic token type: variable
modifiers: -
```

while globals are already distinguished using:

```text
semantic token type: variable
modifiers: global
```

This makes it impossible for editors such as VS Code to visually distinguish local variables from upvalues.

## Example

```lua
local function outer()
local value = 123

return function()
print(value) -- upvalue
end
end
```

Currently the `value` reference inside the inner function is:

```text
variable
```

It would be useful for LuaLS to report it as:

```text
variable + upvalue
```

while the declaration remains:

```text
variable
```

## Proposed semantic token model

```text
variable -> local variable
variable + upvalue -> upvalue
variable + global -> global variable
parameter -> function parameter
```

For example:

```lua
local foo = 1

local function outer(bar)
local baz = 2

return function(qux)
print(foo) -- upvalue
print(bar) -- upvalue
print(baz) -- upvalue
print(qux) -- parameter
print(print) -- global
end
end
```

would produce approximately:

```text
foo -> variable + upvalue
bar -> variable + upvalue
baz -> variable + upvalue
qux -> parameter
print -> variable + global
```

Ordinary locals would remain simply:

```text
variable
```

## Why a modifier?

A modifier seems preferable to introducing a new semantic token type because `upvalue` describes a property of a variable reference rather than a fundamentally different kind of symbol.

It also fits the existing LuaLS representation of globals:

```text
variable + global
```

This gives editor themes a simple way to distinguish all four cases:

```text
variable
variable + upvalue
variable + global
parameter
```

## Scope

The `upvalue` modifier should be applied to references resolved to a variable declared in an enclosing lexical scope.

For example:

```lua
local x = 1

local function f()
print(x)
end
```

would be:

```text
x declaration -> variable
x reference -> variable + upvalue
```

Nested closures should work recursively.

## Motivation

This would allow VS Code themes to use different colors for locals, parameters, upvalues, and globals, making lexical scope much easier to understand in closure-heavy Lua/LuaJIT code.

LuaLS already performs the necessary lexical-scope resolution; this proposal would expose that information through semantic tokens.

La issue non indica file né test. Inizia individuando la generazione dei token semantici di LuaLS e la risoluzione dell’ambito lessicale usata per i riferimenti alle variabili; segui come viene assegnato il modificatore globale esistente. Il lavoro è completato quando ai riferimenti risolti a variabili di ambiti esterni viene assegnato un modificatore upvalue, le dichiarazioni e le variabili locali ordinarie rimangono invariate e le closure annidate sono coperte dai test.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.