LuaLS / LuaLS/lua-language-server
Missing diagnostic when calling a non-function value
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Lua
- 星标
- 4.4k
- 派生
- 442
- PR 合并指标
- 30 天内没有已合并 PR
描述
How are you using the lua-language-server?
Visual Studio Code Extension (sumneko.lua)
Which OS are you using?
Windows
What is the issue affecting?
Diagnostics/Syntax Checking
Expected Behaviour
LuaLS should report a diagnostic when a value whose type is known to be non-callable is called like a function.
For example, calling a number, string, boolean, or a plain table without a known __call / @overload signature should produce a warning/error, because the code will fail at runtime.
Actual Behaviour
No diagnostic is reported.
Even when the value is explicitly annotated or cast as number, LuaLS accepts the call silently.
Reproduction steps
Use the following code:
local x = 1 --[[@as number]]
x()
local y = 1
y()
---@type number
local z = 1
z()
Expected: diagnostics on x(), y(), and z().
Actual: no diagnostics are reported.
At runtime, these calls fail with an error similar to:
attempt to call a number value
Additional Notes
This is different from callable table / __call support.
I am not asking LuaLS to reject values that are explicitly annotated as callable, for example with ---@overload fun(...) or an equivalent __call signature.
The issue is about direct calls to values whose inferred or declared type is definitely not callable, such as number.
This also affects typo detection. For example, code like this can accidentally parse as a function call:
---@param name string
local function greet(name)
return "Hello " .. name "!"
end
Here name "!" is a call expression, but name is a string, so a diagnostic would be useful.
Log File
No response
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
使用调用数值和字符串值的 Lua 代码片段重现该问题,然后跟踪处理调用表达式的诊断或类型检查入口点。完成标准是:对于明确不可调用的值报告诊断,同时仍接受可调用的表以及具有显式 overload 或 __call 签名的值。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- lua
- 领域
- devtools
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 3/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-2 天
- 活跃度
- 冷清
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 65/100