HTTP/2 headers should not be included in snippets
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
- Langage dominant
- TypeScript
- Étoiles
- 1.2k
- Forks
- 242
- Métriques de merge des PR
- Aucune PR mergée en 30 j
Description
It doesn't seem to be explicitly specified anywhere, but when exporting a HAR file for HTTP/2 traffic, it seems that most clients (e.g. Chrome) do include the HTTP/2 pseudo-headers in the header data. These are headers like :authority and :method.
This makes sense for HAR files, when you want an accurate recording of the full traffic details, but these shouldn't be included in HTTP snippets imo. Most clients will reject them completely, for example this curl command generated by httpsnippet will always fail, even though the original request worked fine:
curl --request GET \
--url https://google.com/ \
--header ':authority: google.com' \
--header ':method: GET' \
--header ':path: /' \
--header ':scheme: https' \
--header 'accept: */*' \
--header 'user-agent: curl/7.68.0'
These headers are basically duplicating the method & URL parts, which we include separately anyway. They're just a detail of how the method & URL are sent in HTTP/2. They also won't work because I think in every snippet here we're sending pure HTTP/1 requests, where these are generally illegal header names anyway (which I guess is why curl fails here).
I would suggest we filter these out, i.e. drop all headers starting with : when we load data from the HAR. That will never happen in HTTP/1 traffic, and in HTTP/2 traffic it's almost always redundant, and the rare cases where it's not are very weird (I think sending a request to one domain but with a :authority header for different domain is the only possible example?).
Alternatively, we could try to fully translate HTTP/2 data back into the exactly equivalent HTTP/1 requests. I wrote a blog post about that a while back here: https://httptoolkit.tech/blog/translating-http-2-into-http-1/#translating-one-to-the-other. That would just be the first HTTP/2 -> HTTP/1 list, under 'Translating one to the other', and only half are relevant, so I think it's relatively simple, but it's still more complicated than just dropping the headers, and it might plausibly have other side effects.
What do you think?
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Piste de recherche
Commencez par retracer comment les données HAR sont chargées dans les headers de requête et comment ces headers sont transmis aux générateurs de snippets. Reproduisez l’entrée HAR HTTP/2 d’exemple et comparez la sortie curl générée, puis vérifiez que les pseudo-headers tels que :authority et :method sont exclus sans supprimer les headers ordinaires.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- typescript
- Domaine
- tooling
- Type d'issue
- Bug
- Difficulté
- 3/5
- Temps estimé
- 1-2 jours
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Clarté
- Plutôt claire
- Accessibilité débutants
- 35/100