JuliaRandom / JuliaRandom/RandomNumbers.jl

Please consider implementing xoshiro256** (and/or xoshiro256+)

未关闭
#52 4 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看
主要语言
Julia
星标
100
派生
23
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

描述

https://nullprogram.com/blog/2017/09/21/
"xoroshiro128+ fails PractRand very badly. [..] Since this article was published, its authors have supplanted it with xoshiro256**. It has essentially the same performance, but better statistical properties. xoshiro256** is now my preferred PRNG"

See also my https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/27614#issuecomment-454749117 for others to possibly implement (mostly Google's Randen based on AES, the one I list here would however be my first choice) and updated top comment there.

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

调研方向

Start by reading the linked nullprogram article and the referenced Julia issue comment to understand the proposed xoshiro256** and xoshiro256+ options. No project files, tests, or entry points are named, so inspect RandomNumbers.jl's existing generator structure before deciding where this belongs; done means the requested generator is implemented and integrated consistently.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

评估

技术栈
julia
领域
tooling
Issue 类型
功能
难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
活跃度
停滞
描述清晰度
需要澄清
新手友好度
25/100

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。