JuliaRandom / JuliaRandom/RandomNumbers.jl

Question on RNGs for use in parallel simulations

Abierto
#37 4 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub
Lenguaje dominante
Julia
Estrellas
100
Forks
23
Métricas de merge de PR
Sin PR fusionados en 30 d

Descripción

This is a question rather than an issue. I hope that's OK to ask here.

I would like to use a RNG for parallel simulations, and so want statistically independent RNGs for each worker process.

For `Base.Random.MersenneTwister`, I use something like this:
```
rng = Base.Random.MersenneTwister(0)
rngseed = Base.Random.make_seed()
srand(rng, rngseed)

rngs = randjump(rng, numtrials)

f(trial, rng) = ...
pmap(f, 1:numtrials, rngs)
```

I would like to use a RNG from the `Random123` family.
Is this a good choice for parallel sims?

My code would be something like:
```
rng = RandomNumbers.Random123.Threefry4x()
rngseed = RandomNumbers.gen_seed(rng)
srand(rng, rngseed)

rngs = Vector{typeof(rng)}(numtrials)
for trial = 1:numtrials
rngs[trial] = copy(rng)
RandomNumbers.Random123.set_counter!(rngs[trial], trial)
end

f(trial, rng) = ...
pmap(f, 1:numtrials, rngs)
```

Is using `set_counter!` this way the right approach to give independent RNGs?
Will it work for all RNGs in the Random123 family?
Why would I choose 2x or 4x version?
Which particular RNG would you recommend?

Guía de contribución

No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio

Evaluación

Este issue todavía no se ha evaluado.

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.