JuliaPy / JuliaPy/PythonCall.jl
Why does the argument order of `pyconvert_add_rule` deviate from convention
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 1.1k
- Forks
- 86
- Avg merge
- 1d 22h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Description
According to the [Julia Docs](https://docs.julialang.org/en/v1/manual/style-guide/#Write-functions-with-argument-ordering-similar-to-Julia-Base), function arguments should be placed first because "Putting a function argument first permits the use of [do](https://docs.julialang.org/en/v1/base/base/#do) blocks for passing multiline anonymous functions."
Is there a reason for not following this convention?
Would it be reasonable to support the conventional argument order in addition to the current argument order?
Can we switch fully to the conventional argument order and deprecate the current argument order / remove it in the next breaking release?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.