JuliaPy / JuliaPy/PythonCall.jl
reducing allocations when checking python coroutines
- Langage dominant
- Julia
- Étoiles
- 1.1k
- Forks
- 86
- Merge moyen
- 1 j 22 h
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 3
Description
If I do:
```julia
while !Bool(fut.done())
sleep(0.01)
end
```
where `fut` is a future created like:
```julia
aio = pyimport("asyncio")
coro = aio.sleep(1)
loop = aio.Runner().get_loop()
aio.run_coroutine_threadsafe(coro, loop)
```
It allocates linearly the more you sleep.
I tried using a global julia vector `[true]` and updating it in place when the future is done, but it doesn't reduce allocations that much, is there a better way?
Guide de contribution
Aucun guide de contribution indexé pour ce dépôt
Piste de recherche
No repository file or test is named. Reproduce the polling example using asyncio Future.done(), Runner().get_loop(), run_coroutine_threadsafe(), and Julia sleep(), then measure allocations. Done means finding a supported approach whose allocations do not grow linearly with repeated sleeps and documenting or testing that behavior.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- julia, python
- Domaine
- backend
- Type d'issue
- Bug
- Difficulté
- 3/5
- Temps estimé
- 1-2 jours
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Clarté
- À clarifier
- Accessibilité débutants
- 35/100