JuliaMath / JuliaMath/FixedPointNumbers.jl
Loading FixedPointNumbers invalidates ~7,700 precompiled method instances (7x slower first mtkcompile)
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Julia
- Estrellas
- 95
- Forks
- 38
- Merge medio
- 13 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 2
Descripción
Summary
Loading FixedPointNumbers into a session that already has ModelingToolkit loaded invalidates
7,708 precompiled method instances and makes the first mtkcompile call take 23.59 s
instead of 0.04 s — a huge slowdown in a script that never uses a fixed-point number.
Most users meet this indirectly: ColorTypes/Colors depend on FixedPointNumbers, so any
Makie-based plotting next to ModelingToolkit pays this cost on the first model build.
MWE
# mwe.jl
using ModelingToolkit
using ModelingToolkit: t_nounits as t, D_nounits as D
if get(ENV, "LOAD_FPN", "0") == "1"
@eval using FixedPointNumbers # <-- the only difference
end
@variables x(t)=1.0 y(t)=0.0
@named sys = System([D(x) ~ y, D(y) ~ -x], t)
t0 = time(); mtkcompile(sys); println("mtkcompile: ", round(time()-t0, digits=2), " s")
(test) pkg> st
Status `~/test/Project.toml`
[53c48c17] FixedPointNumbers v0.9.1
[961ee093] ModelingToolkit v11.41.0
$ julia --startup-file=no --project=. mwe.jl
mtkcompile: 0,04 s
$ LOAD_FPN=1 julia --startup-file=no --project=. mwe.jl
mtkcompile: 23.59 s
As a control, loading a package of comparable size that does not add methods to Base
generics (using LaTeXStrings) leaves the time unchanged at 0.04 s, so this is not the
general cost of loading a package.
Attribution
using SnoopCompileCore
using ModelingToolkit
invs = @snoop_invalidations using FixedPointNumbers;
using SnoopCompile
length(uinvalidated(invs)) # 7708, from 15 culprit methods
Ranked by countchildren:
| children | method |
|---|---|
| 14312 | promote_rule(::Type{Fixed{T1,f1}}, ::Type{Fixed{T2,f2}}) where {T1,T2,f1,f2} — src/fixed.jl:199 |
| 3556 | length(r::AbstractUnitRange{N}) where {T<:Unsigned, N<:Normed{T}} — src/normed.jl:304 |
| 3089 | ceil(::Type{Ti}, x::Normed) where Ti<:Integer — src/normed.jl:277 |
| 1668 | showarg(io::IO, a::Array{T}, toplevel) where T<:FixedPoint — src/FixedPointNumbers.jl:279 |
| 403 | reduce_first(::typeof(Base.add_sum), x::FixedPoint) — src/FixedPointNumbers.jl:296 |
| 109 | -(x::X) where X<:FixedPoint — src/FixedPointNumbers.jl:233 |
None of these are type piracy — every one is dispatching on a FixedPointNumbers type. The
cost seems to come from adding methods to widely-inferred Base generics (promote_rule,
length, ceil, convert), which discards inference results in already-loaded packages
that call those generics on non-concrete argument types.
Question
Is there room to narrow any of these signatures, or is this something that has to be fixed
on the consuming side (or in Base)? I am mostly filing this for the record, since the
measured impact is large and I could not find an existing issue about it. Happy to run
further measurements if that helps.
Versions
Julia 1.12.7 (Linux, x86_64), FixedPointNumbers 0.8.6, ModelingToolkit 11.17.0,
SnoopCompile 3.2.9.
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Comienza con mwe.jl y las mediciones de invalidaciones de SnoopCompile; después, inspecciona los métodos indicados en src/fixed.jl, src/normed.jl y src/FixedPointNumbers.jl. Compara firmas más específicas u otros cambios con respecto a las 7.708 invalidaciones y los tiempos de mtkcompile, comprobando al mismo tiempo que el comportamiento de FixedPointNumbers siga siendo correcto; el trabajo estará terminado cuando se reduzca el impacto de carga sin regresiones.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- julia
- Área
- performance
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 42/100