JuliaControl / JuliaControl/ControlExamples.jl
Different result for Autotuning example
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Jupyter Notebook
- Stars
- 33
- Forks
- 14
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hi,
When I try autotuning.ipynb, I got the result like
which is different from the result in the example at Out[41].
I tried to change the initial state to a non-zero vector to achieve a similar response
May I ask why the example doesn't output the same result?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Open autotuning.ipynb and run the notebook to compare the current output with the result shown at Out[41] and the reporter's screenshots. Identify the reason for the discrepancy and update the example or its explanation so the expected result is reproducible.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- jupyter-notebook
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100