InsightSoftwareConsortium / InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITKElastix

Order of transformparameter files when computing inverse

Open
#229 1 comment 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Python
Stars
281
Forks
29
Avg merge
16h 28m
Merged PRs (30d)
8

Description

Hello :)

i want to create an inverse transformation, thus i followed the example in "ITK_Example11_Transformix_DeformationField.ipynb".
I was wondering why the inverse transform ParameterObject is not initialized in the inversed order to the originally created tx,
e.g. i thought the inverse transform must be : inv_tx = affine(bsline(x))

I tested in binder if it makes any difference. The resulting deformation fields look similar but are not similar numerically.

So, does it make any difference what i create as ParameterObject() and what order would be technically correct?
Any clarification would be very appreciated :)

I attached my modifications of ur example for easy reproduction.

[ITK_Example11_Transformix_DeformationField.zip](https://github.com/InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITKElastix/files/11820950/ITK_Example11_Transformix_DeformationField.zip)

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.