InsightSoftwareConsortium / InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITKElastix
Order of transformparameter files when computing inverse
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 281
- Forks
- 29
- Avg merge
- 16h 28m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 8
Description
Hello :)
i want to create an inverse transformation, thus i followed the example in "ITK_Example11_Transformix_DeformationField.ipynb".
I was wondering why the inverse transform ParameterObject is not initialized in the inversed order to the originally created tx,
e.g. i thought the inverse transform must be : inv_tx = affine(bsline(x))
I tested in binder if it makes any difference. The resulting deformation fields look similar but are not similar numerically.
So, does it make any difference what i create as ParameterObject() and what order would be technically correct?
Any clarification would be very appreciated :)
I attached my modifications of ur example for easy reproduction.
[ITK_Example11_Transformix_DeformationField.zip](https://github.com/InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITKElastix/files/11820950/ITK_Example11_Transformix_DeformationField.zip)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.