Naming of the Service vs. Library pattern

While discussing some improvements to the Service vs. Library pattern (details in #353), @robtuley and I spoke about the naming of the pattern. Would a different name make it easier for the readers to understand the pattern?

Repeating some info from the PR below.

From me (@spier):

If you were to name this pattern, how would you call it?
I am asking because the pattern describes an approach that I might call "Library over Service" or "Separate Service Deployments" or "InnerSource with separate deployments".
I don't see the pattern really describing a comparison of InnerSource projects in both release approaches (Library + Service) but rather only focusing on the Library approach.

From @robtuley:

I also find the pattern name confusing, for similar reasons to yourself by the sounds of it.
"Service vs Library" sounds like 2 patterns being compared, this pattern is "Library" but that term doesn't describe this pattern well to me personally because it is applied more widely in our context.
I'd call this pattern "Separate Team Deployments" or maybe "By Use Deployments", and like your suggestion of "Separate Service Deployments".

阅读 issue 中链接的 Service vs. Library pattern 以及 #353 中的相关讨论。比较提出的备选名称，并明确哪个名称最符合该 pattern；命名问题得到解决并相应更新 pattern 后，即视为完成。