ISISComputingGroup / ISISComputingGroup/DataStreaming

`filewriter`: `runlog/icp_event`

Aberta
#92 3 comentários 0 reações 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub
filewriter
Linguagem predominante
Sem dados de linguagem
Estrelas
0
Forks
0
Métricas de merge de PRs
Nenhum PR com merge em 30d

Descrição

The filewriter must be able to write the `runlog/icp_event` group, as parts of this are currently parsed by Mantid.

From discussions, my current understanding is that Mantid:
- _Does_ read `CHANGE_PERIOD` and `CHANGE` events. We will emulate these by looking at the event data stream and emitting a fake `CHANGE_PERIOD` message each time we see incoming data with a different period number.
- _Does_ read `START_COLLECTION`, `STOP_COLLECTION`, `ABORT` messages.
- _Can_ read `BEGIN`, `RESUME`, `END_SE_WAIT`, `PAUSE`, `END`, `ABORT`, `UPDATE`, `START_SE_WAIT` messages, but only if `oldStyle` is being used.
- _Does not_ parse the numbers from `GF x RF x GUAH x` messages.

## Potential differences from existing files

- Proposal is to only write the `newStyle` commands, so `START_COLLECTION`, `STOP_COLLECTION`, `CHANGE`, `CHANGE_PERIOD`, `ABORT`.
- All data will be emulated (derived from the underlying event data):
* `START_COLLECTION` written at the beginning, and then on any transition from a bad frame to a good frame.
* `STOP_COLLECTION` written on any transition from a good frame to a bad frame, and then at the end.
* `ABORT` - not convinced this is meaningful, if the run is aborted then won't get a `.nxs` file at all...
* `CHANGE_PERIOD` will be written any time we get a frame which has a different period than the most-recently-seen frame
- `CHANGE_PERIOD` will account for hardware periods as well as software periods (they look the same to the filewriter in the streaming system). This means that there could be a much higher frequency of `CHANGE_PERIOD` events than previously.
- `START_COLLECTION` and `STOP_COLLECTION` will account for hardware vetos as well as pause/runcontrol (they look the same to the filewriter in the streaming system). This means that there could be a much higher frequency of `START_COLLECTION` and `STOP_COLLECTION` events than previously.

Guia de contribuição

Nenhum guia de contribuição indexado para este repositório

Direção de pesquisa

Start by tracing how the filewriter consumes the underlying event data stream and how it currently writes runlog groups. Compare the proposed newStyle commands with Mantid's stated parsing behavior, then verify that START_COLLECTION, STOP_COLLECTION, CHANGE, and CHANGE_PERIOD reflect good/bad frame and period transitions; resolve whether ABORT belongs before considering the work done.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.

Avaliação

Domínio
data-engineering, stream-processing
Tipo de issue
Funcionalidade
Dificuldade
5/5
Tempo estimado
Mais de uma semana
Status de atividade
Pouca atividade
Clareza
Razoavelmente clara
Facilidade para iniciantes
42/100

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.