HelloZeroNet / HelloZeroNet/ZeroNet
The domain naming scheme proposal
- Langage dominant
- JavaScript
- Étoiles
- 18.8k
- Forks
- 2.3k
- Métriques de merge des PR
- Aucune PR mergée en 30 j
Description
Some related comments and discussions:
* https://github.com/HelloZeroNet/ZeroNet/issues/83#issuecomment-94332474
* https://github.com/HelloZeroNet/ZeroNet/issues/83#issuecomment-489451550
* https://github.com/HelloZeroNet/ZeroNet/issues/1696
* https://github.com/HelloZeroNet/ZeroNet/issues/104
* https://github.com/HelloZeroNet/ZeroNet/issues/2049
The idea:
* ZeroNet site should be accessible with both `http://127.0.0.1:43110/...` and `http://.../` via a proxy.
* When accessing zites with a proxy, the pseudo-TLD `.zeronet` is used:
`http://
* When accessing zites with `http://127.0.0.1:43110/`, the `.zeronet` part can be ommitted and is ignored by the core if present.
These point to the same site:
* `http://127.0.0.1:43110/` - the classic way.
* `http://127.0.0.1:43110/.zeronet` - for similar look&feel to the proxied addresses.
* The second-level domains are handled by plugins.
* * *
The proposed second-level domain schemes:
* **Namecoin domains**: `.bit.zeronet`
* Proxied: http://Talk.ZeroNetwork.bit.zeronet
* Non-proxied: http://127.0.0.1:43110/Talk.ZeroNetwork.bit
* **Cert-based**, as proposed in https://github.com/HelloZeroNet/ZeroNet/issues/1696: `.user.zeronet`
* Proxied: http://geekless.zeroid.user.zeronet, http://geekless.kxoid.user.zeronet
* Non-proxied: http://127.0.0.1:43110/geekless.zeroid.user, http://127.0.0.1:43110/geekless.kxoid.user
* **Opennic-based** (https://github.com/HelloZeroNet/ZeroNet/issues/104): `.opennic.zeronet`
* Proxied: http://example.libre.opennic.zeronet
* Non-proxied: http://127.0.0.1:43110/example.libre.opennic
* **Onion-based** (the protocol proposal hasn't been published yet): `.onion.zeronet`
* Proxied: http://nd6bvylhggfd41g.onion.zeronet
* Non-proxied: http://127.0.0.1:43110/nd6bvylhggfd41g.onion
Guide de contribution
Aucun guide de contribution indexé pour ce dépôt
Piste de recherche
No implementation files, tests, or entry points are named. Read the linked discussions and related issues first, then inspect the existing proxy, core, and plugin handling; done would mean the proposed naming scheme is agreed and implemented consistently for proxied and non-proxied addresses.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Domaine
- networking
- Type d'issue
- Fonctionnalité
- Difficulté
- 5/5
- Temps estimé
- Plus d'une semaine
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Clarté
- Plutôt claire
- Accessibilité débutants
- 25/100