FinTechIntro / FinTechIntro/2024-Spring-Final

Different algorithm among DEXes

未关闭
#1 7 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 3 人 已被 @r12922076 认领 在 GitHub 查看
DeFi topics
主要语言
没有语言数据
星标
0
派生
0
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

描述

## Summary
> Please give a short summary of this research topic.

In the course, we cover Uniswap, but there are several other AMMs, each with its distinct algorithm. What are the differences among these AMMs, and what are their advantages and disadvantages?

## Description
> Please provide a detailed description to the topic.

`Uniswap V2` utilizes the constant product rule, whereas Balancer V2 employs the mean product rule. Are there other types of AMM, and what algorithms do they use? Furthermore, why do they adopt these mechanisms, and what problems are they aiming to solve? Are they focused on capital efficiency, liquidity amount, slippage, or impermanent loss? A comprehensive comparison of these protocols and their designs would focus on their similarities and differences in addressing these concerns.

## Source
> Please provide related resource for the topics, including articles, research papers and more.

[SoK: Decentralized Exchanges (DEX) with Automated Market Maker (AMM) Protocols](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.12732)

[Balancer](https://docs.balancer.fi/)

[Uniswap](https://uniswap.org/)

## Others
> Please provide more information if there is any.

None

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

评估

这个 Issue 还没有评估数据。

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。