FG-Unofficial-Developers-Guild / FG-Unofficial-Developers-Guild/FG-CoreRPG-Extraplanar-Containers

Collapsing container issues

Aberta
#22 0 comentários 0 reações 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub
Linguagem predominante
Lua
Estrelas
7
Forks
4
Métricas de merge de PRs
Nenhum PR com merge em 30d

Descrição

https://www.fantasygrounds.com/forums/showthread.php?67126-PFRPG-Extraplanar-Containers&p=727120&viewfull=1#post727120

> Tested with many extensions, and with only this one alone. The same behavior is observed. (v. 1.21 from GitHub)
>
> With this extension loaded...
> 1. Create a [I]Container[/I] entry in the PC inventory
> 2. Add an [I]Item[/I] to the PC inventory and add the [I]ContainerName[/I] to the [I]Location[/I] field
> 3. Double click the [I]Container[/I] to collapse it
> - This does collapse it, and adds a [B][+][/B] to the Container's name.
> - Double-click again to expand the container, and the [+] is removed
> - This moves the location (makes sense, it always did...resorting alphabetically with the [+] and without.
>
> Only, here's the issue I'm seeing:
> - For this example, I am using [I]0. ACTION ONLY (bag)[/I] (where I store an [I]Improvised Weapon[/I], [I]Unarmed Attack[/I], and [I]Shield Bash[/I] item - so they appear in the Weapon List for the character. Though the same happens in more traditional containers too.
>
> 1. I assign [I]0. ACTION ONLY (bag)[/I] as the location for the [I]Shield Bash[/I] item
> - The inventory UX successfully shifts the item from its purely alphabetical location, it appears under the [I]0. ACTION ONLY (bag)[/I] entry as desired.
> 2. I double-click the container to collapse it
> - As note above, it amends the ContainerName with the [B][+][/B] as if it were collapsed, but does not also amend the name for that entry in the Location column for assigned items.
> - As such, the associated item is still looking (it appears) for the name without the [+] and does not "collapse into" the container. If memory serves, the [+] didn't get amended to the individual item entry locations in the past...my suspicion is that the sorting previously ignored the [+].
> - If I manually add [+] to LocationName in the Location field for the item it will accurately [I]sort [/I]it to be under and indented as "belonging" to the container...but it's still [I]visible [/I]in the inventory list. It doesn't actually collapse or hide inventory.
>
> I hope this helps. :(

Guia de contribuição

Nenhum guia de contribuição indexado para este repositório

Avaliação

Esta issue ainda não foi avaliada.

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.