ContextLab / ContextLab/supereeg
better tests
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 38
- Forks
- 19
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
once we finish cleaning up the code (if it's not already sufficiently clean), we need better tests to verify things are working-- i.e. for some benchmark data, we should verify that performance is at least up to some minimum threshold (that way performance will never gets worse without us realizing).
for example:
- need a way of checking whether things are "working" (i.e. on some sample dataset, can we reconstruct well?)
- check each "condition" (brain object locations are a subset of model locations, brain and model locations match, brain and model locations partially overlap, brain and model locations are distinct)
- also include some checks for when things are expected to break (e.g. not enough locations)
- our checks should go beyond merely checking data types-- they should check that we get the "right answers" up to some threshold similarity or agreement
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.