CommandCodeAI / CommandCodeAI/command-code

The PR /review command incorrectly suggested that taste files not be committed because auto learned

Open
#553 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
No language data
Stars
4k
Forks
350
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Summary

Used muse-spark-1.1 to implement a feature and then /review the PR.

Was told that:

  Specific Suggestions

  - xxx
  - yyy
  - zzz
  - .commandcode/taste/taste.md should not be in PR diff (auto-learned)

which I believe to be incorrect as I want taste to be committed and live within my project as using project-level taste.

Then tried to drop diffs related to taste.

Note: did not clear session between implementation (which also included plan) and review.

Expected Behavior

Not to be given that suggestions.

Actual Behavior

Given suggestion not to commit taste files.

Steps to reproduce the issue
  1. Use muse-spark-1.1 ?
  2. plan a feature
  3. implement
  4. make pr (outside harness)
  5. review
  6. do not clear sessions betweeb
Command Code Version

0.44.1

Operating System

macOS

Terminal/IDE

ghostty

Shell

zsh

Additional context

Command Code v0.44.1

models: muse-spark-1.1 · taste-1

And even when I told it to work on other suggestions, it decided to drop (which I stopped):

 │ diff --git a/.commandcode/taste/taste.md b/.commandcode/taste/taste.md
 │ index 1267bcd..7a74f27 100644
 └  ... +30 lines [ctrl+o to expand]

 SHELL  [git checkout main -- .commandcode/taste/taste.md package.json 2>&1; git status --porcelain | head...]
 │ M  .commandcode/taste/taste.md
 └ M  package.json

 SHELL  [git status --porcelain -u; git checkout -- .commandcode/taste/taste.md package.json; git status -...]
 │ M  .commandcode/taste/taste.md
 │ M  package.json
 └  ... +2 lines [ctrl+o to expand]

 SHELL  [git restore .commandcode/taste/taste.md package.json; git status --porcelain | head -n 20; cat pa...]
 │ M  .commandcode/taste/taste.md
 │ M  package.json
 └  ... +1 lines [ctrl+o to expand]

 SHELL  [pwd; ls -la .commandcode/taste/taste.md; git diff -- .commandcode/taste/taste.md | head -n 20; gi...

I stopped:

❯ Interrupted by user

❯ no i want to keep the taste diffs

⠶ Got it — keeping the taste diffs. Let me restore them and fix the code issues.


 SHELL  [git status --short; echo "---unstaged diff taste---"; git diff -- .commandcode/taste/taste.md | h...]
 │ ERROR: Command failed with exit code 1
 │ Output:
 └  ... +34 lines [ctrl+o to expand]

⠶ Understood — keeping taste diffs. Let me restore it and fix the code issues you flagged.

 SHELL  [git restore --staged .commandcode/taste/taste.md package.json; git restore .commandcode/taste/tas...]
 │ # Slack Commands
 └  ... +5 lines [ctrl+o to expand]

⠶ Restored taste diffs. Now fixing the code issues.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the /review command flow and the handling of .commandcode/taste/taste.md, reproducing on Command Code v0.44.1 with muse-spark-1.1 and a session reused across plan, implement, and review. Compare behavior when project-level taste changes are present and verify that review suggestions and any follow-up restore commands preserve those diffs.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
git, zsh
Domain
ai, cli
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
48/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.