CodeForPhilly / CodeForPhilly/benefit-decision-toolkit
Simpler Library Benefits DMN implementation
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 15
- Forks
- 5
- Avg merge
- 1d 2h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 23
Description
Can a benefit's definition be declarative only?
- Name
- Description
- Version (eventually, when we support versioning per benefit and per eligibility check)
- List of Eligibility Checks
- Each check:
- Default alias for this benefit (e.g. PersonMinAge -> "Client is at least 60 years old")
- Parameters
Need to look at the existing library benefits and test the above.
- one possible caveat: should every check be part of the library or can the benefit itself have a "custom check" that is invisible to the rest of the library? Maybe such a check would also be importable to the builder somehow as a custom check for the given user?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.