ByteDance-Seed / ByteDance-Seed/Depth-Anything-3
Please advise on the issue of inaccurate depth maps
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 6.3k
- Forks
- 702
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
in = np.array([[[1252.81310, 0.00000000, 826.588115],
[0.00000000, 1252.81310, 469.984663],
[0.00000000, 0.00000000, 1.00000000]]])
print("000",in.shape)
images = sorted(glob.glob("/root/autodl-tmp/val-night/"+processed_line))
prediction = model.inference(
images,
intrinsics=in,
align_to_input_ext_scale=True )
This is a very high-quality work, but we are experiencing some issues with inaccurate depth maps.
I set `align_to_input_ext_scale=True`, but the output depth map is (1, 280, 504), while the actual input image dimensions are (3, 900, 1600). I also obtained a poor d1 value(after resize pred).
I believe this is a very good work, and the problem might be due to my incorrect operation. If you have time, please help me. Thank you very much.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
No repository file or test is named. Start by reproducing the shown model.inference call with the supplied intrinsics and image dimensions, then inspect how align_to_input_ext_scale affects the returned depth shape and how the resized prediction is evaluated. Done means determining whether the output dimensions and poor d1 value come from usage or an implementation issue.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- computer-vision, machine-learning
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100