BlueQuartzSoftware / BlueQuartzSoftware/ITKImageProcessing

Using itk::VectorImage instead of itk::Image<Vector<...

Open
#127 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
C++
Stars
4
Forks
12
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Using itk::VectorImage instead of itk::Image (and the corresponding itk::Dream3DImage) with vector components would allow to not hardcode the number of dimension for vectors, and therefore not limit the user to a small number of vector images that can be processed (currently only vectors of dimension 2 and 3 are accepted).

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

Start by locating the uses of itk::Image and itk::Dream3DImage that restrict vector components to dimensions 2 and 3. Trace the related image-processing entry points and tests, then define the scope and validation needed for itk::VectorImage to support arbitrary vector dimensions.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
cpp
Domain
computer-vision
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
30/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.