BlueQuartzSoftware / BlueQuartzSoftware/ITKImageProcessing
Using itk::VectorImage instead of itk::Image<Vector<...
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 4
- Forks
- 12
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Using itk::VectorImage instead of itk::Image (and the corresponding itk::Dream3DImage) with vector components would allow to not hardcode the number of dimension for vectors, and therefore not limit the user to a small number of vector images that can be processed (currently only vectors of dimension 2 and 3 are accepted).
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by locating the uses of itk::Image and itk::Dream3DImage that restrict vector components to dimensions 2 and 3. Trace the related image-processing entry points and tests, then define the scope and validation needed for itk::VectorImage to support arbitrary vector dimensions.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- computer-vision
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100