BlueQuartzSoftware / BlueQuartzSoftware/ITKImageProcessing

Using itk::VectorImage instead of itk::Image<Vector<...

Open
#127 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
C++
Stars
4
Forks
12
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Using itk::VectorImage instead of itk::Image (and the corresponding itk::Dream3DImage) with vector components would allow to not hardcode the number of dimension for vectors, and therefore not limit the user to a small number of vector images that can be processed (currently only vectors of dimension 2 and 3 are accepted).

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.