Testing current master with lethekit

## Abstract

Testing 7604c8089008896bf86c7c18c800aeb86fe5f83e

### Test vector 1
```bash
seed_lethekit=$(seedtool --in ur ur:crypto-seed/oyadgdvlpfssfwmkztcebbnyzowkspnljlrhdkztykahhf)

keytool \
--seed $seed_lethekit \
--address-index '*' \
output-descriptor
```

result OK, matches with lethekit:
```bash
wpkh([b238a845/84h/0h/0h]xpub6D1GQL3S3qryEx5gQccdVB5Fy1ePkeDGU8bMmW1GKfDQvtBsbJ6FaaudsBphw2WwtjYyJ4ARR6Mh9ZRTTKqro6eZww2m6SVxG7WuY2DALVp/0/*)
```

### Test vector 2

```bash
# address wpkh not supported only pkh and sh?
for (( i=0; i <= 9; ++i ))
do
keytool \
--seed 1eb5338edac6fae54cbb172091ae6c1a \
--address-index $i \
address-index \
full-address-derivation-path \
address-pkh
done
```

Result:
```bash
0
c1859926/84h/0h/0h/0/0
17u4HStkGWxJ5PtNqzCMEKRzaPJ8h35eBc
1
c1859926/84h/0h/0h/0/1
1JyxrbHYS7ZGhq68JewhJAMWka38Bv8tFw
2
```

Here I noticed no support for segwit addresses? Also, the output shows segwit derivation path (84h) when `address-pkh` specified (`44h`) -> Not OK.

---

You can generate more test vectors for a particular seed (e.g. lethekit_seed/mnemonic: `together mail awful cradle scrub apart hip leader silk slice unusual embark`) in https://iancoleman.io/bip39/

首先使用 keytool 的 address-index、full-address-derivation-path 和 address-pkh 入口复现 test vector 2，然后跟踪这些命令如何选择派生路径和地址格式。将输出与报告中的 44h 预期和 segwit 观察结果进行比较；当行为得到澄清或修正，并由可重复的 test vector 覆盖时，即视为完成。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。