BlockchainCommons / BlockchainCommons/Community
Project: Document Best Practices for Secure Software Open Development
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Keine Sprachdaten
- Sterne
- 68
- Forks
- 7
- PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
- Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.
Beschreibung
This is another project that would be good for a team with mixed skills, and does not require deeper software engineering experience (but at least one should have experience with build processes).
Various organizations (Linux Foundation, Google, etc.) have offered guidance as to the practices of security, supply chain, etc. , but also emphasize enterprise and OS supply chain use cases. There are also a number of automated tools (apps, GitHub actions, etc.) that can be used to audit on some of these.
However, many are not practical for smaller projects, especially the emerging blockchain security repos, where only a few people may be contributing.
The goal of this project is to survey the existing recommended practices, best practices of various important security projects (including Blockchain Commons practices), etc., to identify which address the biggest threats given the effort (threat analysis), are practical for small projects to implement, which we might be able to offer some documentation and examples of how best to install and use, and guidance to contributors to small projects on how to tool and support this practices (like docs teaching git signing for writers contributing documentation to a secure repo).
Related to: reproducible builds, scripts for protecting master branch, etc.. What are our best practices and what do we recommend to other parties (especially for our CLI apps) @nochiel
Beitragsleitfaden
Rechercherichtung
Es werden keine Dateien oder Tests genannt. Beginnen Sie mit einer Untersuchung der Leitfäden der Linux Foundation und von Google, der Praktiken von Sicherheitsprojekten, der Praktiken von Blockchain Commons, reproduzierbaren Builds, Skripten zum Schutz von Branches und der Git-Signierung. Als erledigt gilt die Dokumentation einer Bedrohungs- und Aufwandsanalyse, praktischer Empfehlungen für kleine Projekte sowie relevanter Tooling- oder Nutzungsbeispiele.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- git, github-actions
- Bereich
- cli, devops, documentation, security
- Issue-Typ
- Dokumentation
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Veraltet
- Klarheit
- Muss geklärt werden
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 25/100