BeyondCodeBootcamp / BeyondCodeBootcamp/beyondcodebootcamp
React Creeds of Craftsmanship?
- 主要語言
- JavaScript
- 星號
- 63
- 分支
- 3
- PR 合併指標
- 30 天內沒有已合併 PR
描述
@coolaj86 doesn't like React, but are there any React software engineers with principles worthy of inclusion in the [Creeds of Craftsmanship](https://github.com/BeyondCodeBootcamp/beyondcodebootcamp/issues/18)?
Here are some posts from [Dan Abramov](https://mobile.twitter.com/dan_abramov) that seem somewhat close to the idea of creeds for React (though they're obviously too long):
* https://overreacted.io/the-elements-of-ui-engineering/
* https://overreacted.io/react-as-a-ui-runtime/
* https://overreacted.io/what-are-the-react-team-principles/
This is just from a cursory search, but **I'd be interested to hear other React engineering creeds**.
Some React [resources](https://gist.github.com/coolaj86/9256619) AJ already knows about:
* https://reactjs.org/docs/thinking-in-react.html
* https://reactjs.org/docs/design-principles.html
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpw9EHDh2bM
Somewhat relevant tweet thread:
https://twitter.com/RionGull/status/1513213164439056385
貢獻指南
這個儲存庫沒有索引到貢獻指南
研究方向
在判定什麼可以算作 creed 之前,請閱讀連結的 Creeds of Craftsmanship issue (#18)、列出的 Dan Abramov 文章以及 React 資源。完成意味著找出合適的 React 工程原則,並就應如何將它們納入 creeds 達成共識;該 issue 沒有指定檔案或測試。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
評估
- 技術堆疊
- javascript, react
- 領域
- documentation
- Issue 類型
- 文件
- 難度
- 5/5
- 預估耗時
- 一週以上
- 活躍度
- 停滯
- 描述清晰度
- 需要釐清
- 新手友好度
- 25/100