BeyondCodeBootcamp / BeyondCodeBootcamp/beyondcodebootcamp

React Creeds of Craftsmanship?

未關閉
#21 1 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視
主要語言
JavaScript
星號
63
分支
3
PR 合併指標
30 天內沒有已合併 PR

描述

@coolaj86 doesn't like React, but are there any React software engineers with principles worthy of inclusion in the [Creeds of Craftsmanship](https://github.com/BeyondCodeBootcamp/beyondcodebootcamp/issues/18)?

Here are some posts from [Dan Abramov](https://mobile.twitter.com/dan_abramov) that seem somewhat close to the idea of creeds for React (though they're obviously too long):

* https://overreacted.io/the-elements-of-ui-engineering/
* https://overreacted.io/react-as-a-ui-runtime/
* https://overreacted.io/what-are-the-react-team-principles/

This is just from a cursory search, but **I'd be interested to hear other React engineering creeds**.

Some React [resources](https://gist.github.com/coolaj86/9256619) AJ already knows about:

* https://reactjs.org/docs/thinking-in-react.html
* https://reactjs.org/docs/design-principles.html
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpw9EHDh2bM

Somewhat relevant tweet thread:
https://twitter.com/RionGull/status/1513213164439056385

貢獻指南

這個儲存庫沒有索引到貢獻指南

研究方向

在判定什麼可以算作 creed 之前,請閱讀連結的 Creeds of Craftsmanship issue (#18)、列出的 Dan Abramov 文章以及 React 資源。完成意味著找出合適的 React 工程原則,並就應如何將它們納入 creeds 達成共識;該 issue 沒有指定檔案或測試。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

評估

技術堆疊
javascript, react
領域
documentation
Issue 類型
文件
難度
5/5
預估耗時
一週以上
活躍度
停滯
描述清晰度
需要釐清
新手友好度
25/100

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。