AppImage / AppImage/AppImageKit

Investigate the use of cgroups to replace FUSE (and open lots of possibilities)

未關閉
#1,278 7 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視
idea
主要語言
沒有語言資料
星號
9.4k
分支
588
PR 合併指標
PR 指標待擷取

描述

Given that tools like podman/buildah/... can mount images within cgroups without root permissions and without FUSE, this may serve as a viable alternative to using FUSE at all. Using cgroups just requires a relatively recent kernel, which most stable distributions nowadays have.

Using cgroups would allow us a lot of fancy additions. For instance, most sandboxing techniques rely on cgroups anyway. Another feature I can think of is writable overlays for AppImages (i.e., using something like aufs or overlayfs to mount a writable layer above the AppImage's filesystem, which, however, seems like some edge case feature to convince existing software to work when packaged into an AppImage, too).

Idea from https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/issues/877#issuecomment-1637217703.

貢獻指南

這個儲存庫沒有索引到貢獻指南

評估

這個 Issue 還沒有評估資料。

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。