AllenNeuralDynamics / AllenNeuralDynamics/biodata-schema

Curation.json

Aperta
#38 0 commenti 0 reazioni 1 assegnatario Assegnata a @dbirman Vedi su GitHub
Lingua principale
Python
Stelle
0
Fork
0
Metriche di merge delle PR
Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g

Descrizione

Users want to be able to "annotate", "curate", and QC data that is an "element" of a data asset but not the entire asset. For example:

- after histology, ephys users want to annotate the real probe track location somewhere
- after spike sorting users need to be able to merge/split units, curating the spike sorting
- in ophys data individual ROIs have per-roi quality control done
- during exaspim reconstruction neurons need to be annotated and there can be thousands of neurons

We currently enable this with the `CurationMetric` but we are finding this unwieldy due to issues with size and supporting the variety of use cases (see [here](https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/aind-data-schema/pull/1608), for example where I'm grappling with how to effectively compress the curations to deal with exaspim properly).

I think that we need to consider making annotation/curation a core concept in the schema, which would make it easier to add a variety of classes supporting the different use cases we're running into. This would also allow us to enforce standardization on some kinds of annotations, for example ephys probe track annotations should ideally be in an atlas coordinate system! It would also make it more obvious to users where we expect them to put these kinds of things which are currently hidden in the QC.

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Valutazione

Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.