AdguardTeam / AdguardTeam/AdGuardDNS

AdGuard DNS appears to be less favorable for VPN users.

Offen
#787 1 Kommentar 1 Reaktion 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen
feature request
Vorherrschende Sprache
Go
Sterne
952
Forks
82
PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.

Beschreibung

### Issue Details

According to an AdGuard[ blog post ](https://adguard-dns.io/en/blog/privacy-friendly-edns-client-subnet.html)and my personal testing, ECS seems to be optimized only for large ISPs and may not be optimized for hosting providers commonly used by AWS, Linode, and VPN companies like CDN77 and M247. Therefore, it's common to see instances where, for example, I use a Tokyo EC2 instance, but ECS may be targeting AWS' European/North American segments.

### Proposed solution

I personally believe clients should have the option to choose whether to use ECS. Personally, I lean towards not using ECS. In my tests with 1.1.1.1 and 9.9.9.9, I found the DNS resolution results to be satisfactory as well.

### Alternative solution

Perhaps we can take a cue from Controld; their ECS points to their own DNS server segments. For example, if I use a Tokyo M247 server, Controld's ECS would point to NetActuate's Tokyo segment.
![Screenshot_20240617_175744](https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardDNS/assets/172008934/66d925c8-192e-4b70-a865-72ed7af49ede)

Beitragsleitfaden

Für dieses Repository ist kein Beitragsleitfaden indexiert

Bewertung

Dieses Issue wurde noch nicht bewertet.

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.