AbsaOSS / AbsaOSS/enceladus

Better names for Standardization and Conformation jobs

Abierto
#1,032 0 comentarios 1 reacción 0 asignados Ver en GitHub
Conformance feature priority: undecided Standardization under discussion
Lenguaje dominante
Scala
Estrellas
33
Forks
16
Métricas de merge de PR
Sin PR fusionados en 30 d

Descripción

## Background
The discussion about better naming of jobs was started in PR #1009.
Here are the suggestions.

@Zejnilovic siggested
> This might prove hard to read. This would then say
> ```
> Dynamic Conformance 1.5.0 ComplexDataStructures 21 2019-01-01 1
> ```
> how about something like
> ```
> Dynamic Conformance 1.5.0 - ComplexDataStructures(v. 21) 2019-01-01, v. 1
> ```
> Or something similar.

@DzMakatun
> 1. As one of the potential uses is to filter json from Spark History API, I would suggest to keep the parsing as simple as possible. So lets keep it with the spaces only.
> 2. I would also remove the word "Dynamic", to keep it consistent with Standardization naming, and, also a bit shorter.

## Feature
The idea is to change Standardization and Conformance job names to something that is
* Easier to understand by users
* Be parsable so that Spark history can be analyzed easier.

Guía de contribución

Abrir la guía de contribución

Evaluación

Este issue todavía no se ha evaluado.

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.