AbsaOSS / AbsaOSS/EventGate

EventStats: compiled queries endpoint for server-side aggregations

Abierto
#116 1 comentario 0 reacciones 1 asignado Reclamado por @tmikula-dev Ver en GitHub
enhancement
Lenguaje dominante
Python
Estrellas
4
Forks
0
Merge medio
1 d 5 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
8

Descripción

### Feature Description

Extend the EventStats Lambda with a **compiled queries** endpoint — a curated list of predefined, server-executed queries (e.g. "failed jobs in the last 7 days", "job count aggregated by catalog") that consumers can invoke by name. Rather than pushing aggregation logic into the client or BI tool, the heavy lifting runs inside PostgreSQL and only the final result set is returned over the wire.

### Problem / Opportunity

The current `POST /stats/{topic_name}` endpoint returns raw paginated rows. Consumers (dashboards, reports, downstream tools) re-derive the same aggregations repeatedly on the client side — wasting bandwidth, duplicating logic, and making results inconsistent across consumers. Predefined server-side queries centralise that logic, reduce payload sizes significantly, and allow PostgreSQL query planning to optimise repeated patterns.

### Acceptance Criteria

- A new route (e.g. `POST /stats/{topic_name}/query/{query_name}`) accepts a query identifier and an optional parameter bag (e.g. time window, tenant filter).
- A `SUPPORTED_QUERIES` registry maps each `query_name` to its SQL template and accepted parameters — unknown names return `400`.
- Queries are executed server-side; only the aggregated result is returned (no raw row streaming).
- The endpoint is protected by the same JWT auth and per-topic ACL as the rest of EventStats.
- Unknown or unsupported `query_name` values produce a clear `400` error, not a `500`.
- Unit tests cover routing, registry lookup, and each query's result shaping.
- Integration tests validate at least one aggregation query end-to-end against a seeded testcontainer database.
- All quality gates pass (`./ci_local.sh`).

> **Note for implementer:** the concrete set of queries and their SQL definitions must be identified and agreed upon as part of this issue's implementation. The examples below are starting points only — validate with stakeholders which aggregations are actually needed before writing SQL.

### Proposed Solution

Introduce a `CompiledQueryRegistry` (or extend `ReaderPostgres`) that maps query names to parameterised SQL templates (using `psycopg2` `%s` / `sql.SQL` composition — never string interpolation). Each entry declares its accepted input parameters and output schema.

Example candidate queries to evaluate with stakeholders:
- `failed_jobs_last_7d` — count and list of jobs with a failure status in the last N days, grouped by pipeline/tenant.
- `aggregation_by_catalog` — job count, success rate, and average elapsed time grouped by catalog/source.
- `run_status_summary` — distribution of run statuses (running, completed, failed) over a configurable time window.

Route dispatch follows the existing `ROUTE_HANDLERS` pattern in `event_stats_lambda.py`. A new `HandlerCompiledQuery` (or an extension of `HandlerStats`) handles validation and delegates to the registry.

### Dependencies / Related

- Builds on the EventStats Lambda introduced in PR #113.
- Connection pooling (#115) should be resolved first to avoid per-query connection overhead under aggregation load.

Guía de contribución

No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio

Evaluación

Este issue todavía no se ha evaluado.

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.