Incorrect Testing Failures Message

I've observed that the test reports for some bugs seem to get the “expected“ value and “but was” value obtained reversed.
For example:

Bug_ID: `ADD`

Buggy_Code:
```java
/* Add two numbers x and y
>>> add(2, 3)
5
>>> add(5, 7)
12 */

public class ADD {
public static int add(int x, int y) {
return x | y;
}
}
```

Test Cases:
```java
public class TEST_ADD {
@org.junit.Test(timeout = 3000)
public void test_0() throws java.lang.Exception {
int result = humaneval.buggy.ADD.add(0, 1);
org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(
result, 1
);
}

@org.junit.Test(timeout = 3000)
public void test_1() throws java.lang.Exception {
int result = humaneval.buggy.ADD.add(1, 0);
org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(
result, 1
);
}

@org.junit.Test(timeout = 3000)
public void test_2() throws java.lang.Exception {
int result = humaneval.buggy.ADD.add(2, 3);
org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(
result, 5
);
}

@org.junit.Test(timeout = 3000)
public void test_3() throws java.lang.Exception {
int result = humaneval.buggy.ADD.add(5, 7);
org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(
result, 12
);
}

@org.junit.Test(timeout = 3000)
public void test_4() throws java.lang.Exception {
int result = humaneval.buggy.ADD.add(7, 5);
org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(
result, 12
);
}
}
```

Current (Incorrect) Testing Failures Message:
```
Tests run: 5, Failures: 3, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.032 s <<< FAILURE! - in humaneval.TEST_ADD
test_2(humaneval.TEST_ADD) Time elapsed: 0 s <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<3> but was:<5>
at humaneval.TEST_ADD.test_2(TEST_ADD.java:23)

test_3(humaneval.TEST_ADD) Time elapsed: 0 s <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<7> but was:<12>
at humaneval.TEST_ADD.test_3(TEST_ADD.java:31)

test_4(humaneval.TEST_ADD) Time elapsed: 0 s <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<7> but was:<12>
at humaneval.TEST_ADD.test_4(TEST_ADD.java:39)
```

Correct Testing Failures Message:
```
Tests run: 5, Failures: 3, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.032 s <<< FAILURE! - in humaneval.TEST_ADD
test_2(humaneval.TEST_ADD) Time elapsed: 0 s <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<5> but was:<3>
at humaneval.TEST_ADD.test_2(TEST_ADD.java:23)

test_3(humaneval.TEST_ADD) Time elapsed: 0 s <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<12> but was:<7>
at humaneval.TEST_ADD.test_3(TEST_ADD.java:31)

test_4(humaneval.TEST_ADD) Time elapsed: 0 s <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<12> but was:<7>
at humaneval.TEST_ADD.test_4(TEST_ADD.java:39)
```

Reproduisez l’exemple ADD à l’aide des cas de test Java montrés et comparez les messages d’échec actuels et corrects. Suivez le point d’entrée du test ou de la génération du rapport responsable du formatage des échecs d’assertion ; le travail est terminé lorsque les tests en échec étiquettent la valeur attendue comme expected et la valeur renvoyée comme actual.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.