AI-Hypercomputer / AI-Hypercomputer/maxtext
Why logit checker has such a high tolerance?
- 主要語言
- Python
- 星號
- 2.4k
- 分支
- 607
- 平均合併
- 2 天 19 小時
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 158
描述
Hi, I would like to understand why the comparison with the golden logits uses high absolute tolerance values, such as:
- `--atol=3` for [Mistral-7b](https://github.com/AI-Hypercomputer/maxtext/blob/1ff8505cb2c9fb5abd65de73cf3d9b70cec20890/end_to_end/tpu/mistral/7b/test_mistral-7b.sh#L42)
- `--atol=1.0` for [Gemma2-9b](https://github.com/AI-Hypercomputer/maxtext/blob/1ff8505cb2c9fb5abd65de73cf3d9b70cec20890/end_to_end/tpu/gemma2/9b/2_test_gemma.sh#L47)
while some models achieve more similar results with smaller tolerances:
- `--atol=0.2` for [Llama-2-70b](https://github.com/AI-Hypercomputer/maxtext/blob/1ff8505cb2c9fb5abd65de73cf3d9b70cec20890/end_to_end/tpu/llama2/70b/2_test_llama2_70b.sh#L63C53-L63C63)
Why is this high tolerance needed? I understand we might expect numerical differences, but I was hoping for more similar results when implementations are equivalent.
貢獻指南
評估
這個 Issue 還沒有評估資料。