A few econ oddities

There's a few questions that positively/negatively impact the economic/market axis that are a bit confusing, and, in my opinion, should be reworked.

To this end, there's a few that seem odd:
`"question": "I support regional unions, such as the European Union.",`

This one is odd because generally those of a market-oriented persuasion are going to be of no opinion on if the EU is good or bad, as this is more of a societal/progressive question than necessarily a governmental/economic one. Someone who is market oriented isn't going to care about a union or not; they're only going to care about *trade* policy of their country. For example; someone could support fierce EU independence, but still ultimately come out *very strongly* in favor of trade deals with other EU nations.

` "question": "Military spending is a waste of money.",`

This one should definitely have an economic component to it; those who are more market oriented are inherently going to be against governmental spending.

` "question": "All people - regardless of factors like culture or sexuality - should be treated equally."`

This one doesn't have much to do with market forces at all; "treated equally" is likewise, ambiguous; is it equal treatment before the law? Equal treatment in terms of lack of judgment? Equality of results?

`"question": "It is important that we further my group's goals above all others.",`

This isn't even remotely an economic question; this should purely be a societal/civil rights/diplomacy issue.

L'issue punta a domande specifiche nel set di domande del quiz, probabilmente in un file JSON o JavaScript. Trova dove sono definite queste domande (cerca file come questions.js o a data.json). Comprendi come ogni domanda viene mappata all'asse 'economic' nella logica di scoring. Il lavoro comporta riformulare o ricategorizzare le domande elencate, quindi verificare che le modifiche non rompano lo scoring del quiz.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.