abnormal average time when querying different data volume for the same key

**Description**
During query performance testing, it was found that querying all data rows for a key incurs the least time cost; querying a subset of data within a specified time range for a key results in a relatively increased time cost; querying data for a specific timestamp for a key results in an even greater increase in time cost.

Detail：
table：import TalkingData train dataset (180+ million rows) into openmldb
query key： ip=88

| key | other condition | rows | average time(us) |
|-------|-------------------------------------------------------|-------|------------------|
| ip=88 | all | 4278 | 9774.375 |
| ip=88 | '2017-11-06 00:00:00' <= ts < "2017-11-07 00:00:00" | 183 | 11570.365 |
| ip=88 | ts='2017-11-06 16:19:38' | 1 | 16504.145 |

more result detail: https://qiok3h8ob4.feishu.cn/docx/YkYfdBZm9oVk0MxLFx9co8lLn1g?from=from_copylink

**Expected Behavior**
querying smaller amounts of data should have shorter time costs, or at least not longer than querying larger amounts of data.

**Steps to Reproduce**

1. deploy openmldb;
2. load data （TalkingData train.csv）into table;
3. find a key with large enough total data volume;
4. execute queries and calculate the average time cost;

The issue describes a performance anomaly in OpenMLDB where querying fewer rows for a key takes longer. Start by examining the query execution path for timestamp-based filters versus full key scans. Look at the indexing and data layout for the 'ts' column. Reproduce the issue using the TalkingData dataset and profile the queries to identify bottlenecks.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.