4paradigm / 4paradigm/OpenMLDB

disk table supports duplicate key?

Abierto
#2,318 0 comentarios 0 reacciones 1 asignado Reclamado por @zhanghaohit Ver en GitHub
enhancement storage-engine
Lenguaje dominante
C++
Estrellas
1.7k
Forks
331
Merge medio
12 d 12 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
1

Descripción

**Describe the feature you'd like**

One big difference between disk table and mem table is that disk table only allows one unique key per index.
For example, if the index is . the rows we inserted are:

|id |col1 | col2|
|-------| ------ | ----- |
1 | k1 | 1
2 | k1 | 1
3 | k2 | 1
4 | k2 | 2

In mem table, it will be:
|id |col1 | col2|
|-------| ------ | ----- |
1 | k1 | 1
2 | k1 | 1
3 | k2 | 1
4 | k2 | 2

However, in disk table, it will be:
|id |col1 | col2|
|-------| ------ | ----- |
1 | k1 | 1
3 | k2 | 1
4 | k2 | 2

because row 1 and row 2 have the same value of .

We should discuss whether we should support the same semantics for both disk table and memory table.

**Additional context**
One possible solution is to add a sequence number to the combined key for disk table.

Guía de contribución

Abrir la guía de contribución

Línea de trabajo

Look at the disk table and memory table implementations to understand how keys are handled. The issue suggests adding a sequence number to the combined key for disk tables to allow duplicates. Start by examining the index structures and insertion logic, then design a change that maintains performance while supporting duplicate keys. Testing will involve verifying that duplicate rows are preserved in disk tables as they are in memory tables.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Evaluación

Stack tecnológico
sql
Área
backend, databases
Tipo de issue
Nueva funcionalidad
Dificultad
4/5
Tiempo estimado
3-5 días
Estado de actividad
Estancado
Claridad
Bien especificado
Aptitud para principiantes
45/100

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.