43081j / 43081j/tailwind-lit-example

Is this still the recommended approach?

Offen
#3 3 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen
Vorherrschende Sprache
TypeScript
Sterne
4
Forks
0
PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.

Beschreibung

Hey,
Thanks for all the work you've done trying to figure out `tailwind + lit`... You're consistently the one showing up in my searches as I try to figure out the best way to do it.

Does this repo still represent what you consider best practice? We've just avoided the shadow-dom until now to keep tailwind working, but not being able to use slots is getting frustrating. It's been a while since you published this, and just wondered if you're still happy with the solution.

Beitragsleitfaden

Für dieses Repository ist kein Beitragsleitfaden indexiert

Rechercherichtung

Review the repository's README and any recent commits to understand the current approach. Check if there are newer examples or discussions in the issues. Determine if the solution still works with the latest versions of Tailwind and Lit, and whether slots can be used effectively within the shadow DOM. Look for any configuration files or build scripts that integrate Tailwind with Lit components.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Bewertung

Tech-Stack
tailwindcss, typescript
Bereich
frontend, web-dev
Issue-Typ
Dokumentation
Schwierigkeit
3/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
1-2 Tage
Aktivitätsstatus
Ruhig
Klarheit
Größtenteils klar
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
45/100

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.