Add base fee that covers nullifier, account and output note hashes

The initial fee implementation contains only the `verification_base_fee`, but we need additional ones to cover the cost of inserting nullifiers and accounts into their respective tree and notes in the block note tree and potentially data storage. I'll ignore data storage in this issue since we have discussed it the least.

There are at least two approaches we've previously discussed:
- Two separate `tree_base_fee` and `output_note_base_fee`.
- A single `hash_base_fee` that covers any kind of hashing operation.

As explained [here](https://github.com/0xMiden/miden-base/discussions/1217#discussioncomment-12589475) and [here](https://github.com/0xMiden/miden-base/discussions/1217#discussioncomment-12611386) nullifiers + accounts and output notes are independent resources and so they shouldn't be covered by the same base fee. This suggests separate base fees.

The argument for having a single fee is that, essentially, the expensive part of inserting nullifiers, account updates or notes into the block note tree are hash operations. And so a single base fee would be sufficient, at least, conceptually. Moreover, an important resource we care about is the number of cycles a transaction adds to the batch and block kernels and input/output notes contribute to this metric (see also https://github.com/0xMiden/miden-base/discussions/1217#discussioncomment-12637530), and so these would already be partially captured by the cycle-based `verification_base_fee`.

I'm honestly not sure what the better approach is, so I would default to implementing the simpler option first and if we find it is insufficient, split the `hash_base_fee` into two later.

Broken out of https://github.com/0xMiden/miden-base/issues/1673.