Use response payload budget instead of per-field entry limits for gRPC responses

## Background

In #2153, we added support for `GetAccount` to return all storage maps. During review, we noted that the current API limit model is still too rigid: some response paths cap individual fields by number of elements, even though tonic enforces an overall 4 MiB gRPC message size limit.

For example, storage map details currently cap individual maps at 1000 entries. That means a response with 10,000 entries from one map may be rejected/truncated, while a response with 1000 entries from each of 10 maps may be allowed, even though both have similar payload-size implications.

The review suggestion was to move away from individual field limits where the real constraint is response size.

## Current behavior

- `GetAccount` has special response budgeting for `AllStorageMaps`, but individual storage maps still use `AccountStorageMapDetails::MAX_RETURN_ENTRIES = 1000`.
- `AccountVaultDetails` also uses `MAX_RETURN_ENTRIES = 1000`.
- Shared RPC limits in `crates/utils/src/limiter.rs` use element-count limits for several endpoints, with comments tying those limits to the 4 MiB payload budget.
- Some endpoints already use payload-size-aware pagination, e.g. `SyncNotes` / `SyncTransactions`, so behavior is inconsistent across APIs.

## Problem

Per-field element caps are not a good proxy for the actual gRPC response size. They can reject valid responses that fit under 4 MiB and allow combinations that only happen to stay safe because each individual field is capped.

This makes the API less flexible than necessary and spreads response-size reasoning across endpoint-specific constants.

## Proposed direction

Refactor response-size enforcement so that endpoints whose main constraint is tonic's 4 MiB response limit apply an overall encoded-size budget instead of arbitrary per-field entry limits.

For `GetAccount`, this likely means:

- apply a single response payload budget across account code, vault details, storage header, and storage map details;
- allow any individual storage map to exceed 1000 entries if the final encoded response remains within the budget;
- return existing `too_many_entries` / `too_many_assets` markers only when including that data would exceed the response budget;
- keep stricter request/work limits where they protect query fan-out, proof generation, or database load rather than response size.

## Acceptance criteria

- `GetAccount` enforces the 4 MiB response payload budget at the response level, not via a hard 1000-entry cap per storage map.
- Existing request fan-out limits, such as explicit storage map key proof requests, remain in place where needed.
- Other RPC/store endpoints with element-count limits are audited and categorized as either:
- true request/work limits, or
- response-size limits that should become payload-budget based.
- `GetLimits` documentation/API output is updated if any exposed limit semantics change.
- Tests cover cases where:
- a single large field fits under the response budget and is returned;
- a combination of fields exceeds the response budget and is truncated/paginated/marked consistently;
- generated responses stay below tonic's 4 MiB limit.

Das Issue verweist auf crates/utils/src/limiter.rs für gemeinsame RPC-Limits und erwähnt den GetAccount-Endpunkt. Beginne damit, die aktuellen Eintragslimits pro Feld (wie AccountStorageMapDetails::MAX_RETURN_ENTRIES) und die 4-MiB-gRPC-Beschränkung in tonic zu untersuchen. Sieh dir an, wie SyncNotes/SyncTransactions eine Pagination implementieren, die die Payload-Größe berücksichtigt. Ziel ist es, Limits pro Feld durch ein Gesamtbudget für die codierte Größe zu ersetzen und sicherzustellen, dass Antworten unter 4 MiB bleiben. Tests sollten die Durchsetzung des Budgets und den Fortbestand der bestehenden Request-Fan-out-Limits überprüfen.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.