xiph / xiph/opus

behavior difference for opus-tools and opus_demo

Open
#223 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
C
Stars
3.3k
Forks
808
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

i encode and decode a wav or pcm file with 16khz sample rate.

the result pcm of opus_demo binary by opus source code contains all frequency information between 0-8khz.

the result wav of opusenc opusdec binary by opus-tool contains frequency information between about 0-7.5khz.

why there is difference for the output audio's frequency information ?

thanks.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Reproduce the comparison using a 16 kHz WAV or PCM input with both opus_demo and the opusenc/opusdec tools, then inspect their command-line entry points and encoding settings. Compare the resulting frequency ranges and document whether the difference is expected or identifies a defect; the issue names no files or tests to run.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
c
Domain
audio-video-rtc
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.