Edit XCHandles NFT metadata atomically
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 59
- Forks
- 34
- Avg merge
- 4d 14h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 31
Description
Parent: #867
Depends on: unified XCHandles profile modeling under #867.
Summary
Support full, atomic metadata replacement for XCHandles NFTs instead of Sage's existing append-only NFT URI update path.
Scope
- Use
AnyMetadataUpdater/Nft::transfer_with_metadataandHandleNftMetadatafor compatible handle NFTs. - Add typed request/response models and validated UI fields for display name, avatar/image, resolved address/profile fields, URIs, and hashes supported by the protocol.
- Preview the exact old/new metadata and resulting launcher/owner relationships before signing.
- Verify the confirmed NFT metadata and live registry mapping after submission, refresh caches, and surface mismatch/change warnings.
- Keep ordinary NFT URI updates unchanged.
Acceptance criteria
- A compatible owned handle NFT can atomically replace all supported metadata fields.
- Invalid metadata, hashes, URIs, unsupported updater puzzles, and non-owned NFTs are rejected before signing.
- Confirmation clearly distinguishes local display data from on-chain metadata.
- Post-confirmation verification detects unexpected metadata or registry changes.
- Simulator tests cover blank-to-populated and populated-to-updated handle metadata without changing launcher identity.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with parent issue #867 and the unified XCHandles profile modeling it describes, then trace the existing Sage NFT URI update path. Read the AnyMetadataUpdater, Nft::transfer_with_metadata, and HandleNftMetadata interfaces before defining the request, response, validation, preview, and verification boundaries. Done means the acceptance criteria pass, including simulator coverage for blank-to-populated and populated-to-updated metadata.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- blockchain
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100