Add an alternative way to represent trait contracts
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 51
- Forks
- 2
- Avg merge
- 2h 29m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 6
Description
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the linked GitLab issue 5, since the GitHub issue does not describe the alternative representation or its requirements. Then inspect the Rust crate's procedural-macro implementation. The work is complete only when the linked proposal's intended trait-contract representation and acceptance criteria are defined and implemented.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100