wunderforge / wunderforge/agenova

[E8-T6] Add Kubernetes artifact validation gates

Open
#63 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
area:delivery area:kubernetes priority:p1 type:ticket
Dominant language
Go
Stars
4
Forks
0
Avg merge
2d 13h
Merged PRs (30d)
41

Description

## Outcome

repository-owned Kubernetes delivery artifacts fail deterministically before real-cluster execution when they are malformed or incompatible with the supported schemas.

## Delivery contract

- **Parent Epic:** #12 (E8)
- **Size:** S
- **Depends on:** #45 (E7-T2), #50 (E8-T3)
- **Wave:** Wave C - Credible delivery
- **Sequence:** 803.5

## Acceptance criteria

- the shared check harness validates YAML formatting/parsing; runs `helm lint` and deterministic `helm template` only when charts exist; validates rendered manifests and required CRDs against pinned schemas; the disposable-cluster lane adds server-side dry-run; one invalid fixture proves the offline PR gate fails; all entry points reuse the shared check profiles.

## Quality gate and evidence

- G1 with a failing invalid fixture and passing offline validation, plus G5 server-side dry-run output from the disposable cluster.
- Record exact commands/artifacts in the PR; prose-only confirmation is not evidence.

## Non-goal

- production Helm lifecycle, a live cluster on every PR, or validating vendored upstream artifacts Agenova does not own.

## Definition of Done

- Acceptance behavior and its named negative case are observable.
- Focused checks and the repository baseline pass, or an explicit blocker is recorded.
- A teammate can reproduce the evidence.
- The change remains inside the parent Epic and architecture boundary.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Start with the shared check harness and every entry point that reuses its check profiles; trace the offline PR gate and disposable-cluster lane described in the acceptance criteria. Confirm YAML, Helm, rendered-manifest, CRD-schema, and server-side dry-run checks, then reproduce the invalid-fixture failure, passing offline validation, and recorded G5 evidence.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
helm, kubernetes
Domain
ci-cd, infrastructure, testing-qa
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
48/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.