worldcoin / worldcoin/agentkit

Integration idea: human-backed agents + escrowed scoped work

Open
#29 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
TypeScript
Stars
24
Forks
3
Avg merge
19m
Merged PRs (30d)
1

Description

Hi World AgentKit team — I’m building AI Work Market, an open-source testnet layer for escrowed scoped AI-agent work.

Your “bridging humans and agents online” direction is highly relevant because agent work needs both identity/trust and settlement. AI Work Market is testing the settlement side:

  • scoped work offer
  • funded USDC escrow
  • proof URI / deliverable
  • review + release/refund/dispute lifecycle
  • settlement record that can become reputation input

Links:

Question: would it be useful to explore a demo where human-backed or policy-constrained agents can post/accept small paid testnet work, then produce a settlement/proof record?

I can build a small external demo or adapter if this is aligned.

Status note: Base Sepolia testnet only, not audited, centralized disputes for now. No production funds.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Review the proposed integration and the linked examples/x402/quote-gate.js entry point, then compare it with the AI Work Market source and first-agent page. Clarify whether AgentKit should support a human-backed or policy-constrained agent demo, and define completion as an agreed external adapter or demo with a settlement/proof record.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
blockchain, javascript, typescript
Domain
backend-api-design, blockchain
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.