workbenchdev / workbenchdev/Workbench
editor sees syntax child [type="suffix"] Box {} as broken
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 844
- Forks
- 91
- Avg merge
- 7h 12m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
I'm not sure if this is the way, I got the answer from an LLM, as I couldn't find the answer to this through googling.
I wanted to achieve what is mentioned here:
The AdwActionRow implementation of the GtkBuildable interface supports adding a child at its end by specifying “suffix” or omitting the “type” attribute of a element.
But I couldn't find a way, besides what I got from LLM.
While the LSP seems to be comlaining, GTK does render it correctly, so it probably is the right syntax I think?
if I'm having a skill isue lemme know. I picked up GTK4 this week and still learning :)
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files or tests are named. Start by reproducing the GTK4/libadwaita ActionRow markup in the editor and inspect the LSP diagnostic for the child type="suffix" syntax. Done means the editor accepts valid syntax without reporting it as broken, or the supported syntax and limitation are clearly documented.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- desktop, tooling
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100