web-platform-tests / web-platform-tests/rfcs
Set policy for LLM-generated tests
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 110
- Forks
- 90
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
CC @web-platform-tests/wpt-core-team
I was recently asked about the policy for using LLMs to generate tests that are submitted to wpt. Currently we don't have any explicit policy on this, but I think we need one, so it's clear to test authors what's permissible, and to downstream consumers whether wpt is in line with any other policies they might have with regard to LLMs.
To be clear, I expect that any policy here would not affect review requirements i.e. we'd still require human review for all tests to ensure they're correct and easy to follow.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading RFC issue 202 and its six comments, then identify the unresolved questions about LLM-generated tests and downstream policy expectations. Done means the project has an explicit, agreed policy for what test authors may submit, while retaining human review requirements.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- testing-qa
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100