protocol extension: define what ‘additional characters’ mean
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 718
- Forks
- 228
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
The specifications talks about ‘additional characters’ when it refers to the vendor prefixes defined in CSS 2.1. The CSS spec does not define what these are, so perhaps we should do that in our spec.
An alternative, and perhaps more reusable approach, would be to define this more clearly in the WHATWG Compat spec or in Infra.
cc @jugglinmike
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Read the WebDriver specification context around “additional characters,” then compare the linked CSS 2.1 vendor-keywords, WHATWG Compat, and Infra specifications. Determine whether the definition belongs in WebDriver or should be reused from another specification; the work is done when the term has an agreed, explicit definition or reference.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- css
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100