w3c / w3c/resource-timing

Resource processing time

Open
#133 5 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

enhancement
Dominant language
Bikeshed
Stars
135
Forks
40
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

While talking to people about visual metrics and the reasons it's currently hard to get them from RUM, a recurrent theme is that knowing the resources processing time would be useful for understanding their visual impact.

Use cases I encountered so far:

  • Image processing time would enable developers to estimate when these images were painted to screen. That can be used along with Element Timing, or as a polyfill for Element Timing. Because images are decoded in a progressive manner, we may need a list of events in that case.
  • Font processing time would enable developers to estimate when the fonts were paints to screen.
  • JS processing time would enable developers to take note that the performance impact of JS goes beyond its download. There may be a case in favor of splitting that between parsing (one time event) and execution (potentially ongoing). The "ongoing" case has some overlap with LongTasks, so that will require some thought.

Does it make sense to add that to Resource Timing? Or should we try to split it out into a separate spec that hooks into Resource Timing, in a similar way to Server Timing?

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reading the Resource Timing specification and compare the existing Element Timing and Server Timing approaches mentioned in the issue. Clarify whether resource processing events belong in Resource Timing or a separate specification, including image, font, and JavaScript cases. Done means a documented, agreed scope and integration direction.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
javascript
Domain
performance
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.