Member Associations to Liaison Relationships
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Needs AB Feedback
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 262
- Forks
- 194
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I've heard people suggest that we need to transition Member Associations to a Liaison model, but didn't see an issue for it.
See also https://github.com/w3c/board/issues/180
cc @dwsinger
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading this issue and the linked W3C board issue #180 to understand the proposed transition. The issue does not identify files, tests, or a concrete acceptance condition; work is done only when the intended Member Association-to-Liaison change and its Process Document scope are agreed.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100