"Wide review" is too easy to confuse with "horizontal review"
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 262
- Forks
- 194
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
It might be better if we could come up with something more clear, like "public review" or even "public-wide review", to more clearly capture its intent and broad scope? (and to distinguish it more clearly from the undefined, yet, often used 'horizontal review').
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No file or test is named. Start by locating the Process Document definition of “Wide review” and checking how “horizontal review” is used; done means agreeing on a clearer term and applying it consistently wherever the existing term appears.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- html
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100