Consider adding menclose to core
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 56
- Forks
- 20
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
This addresses some discussion from the 24/5/24 meeting that came up in relation to what should go in in the accessibility tree.
Although menclose can be done via CSS, the CSS can be quite complicated, especially for arrowheads (see the polyfill for some css). Standardizing this via the notation attribute would simplify the MathML need. It would also enhance accessibility because strikeouts/cancellations and other modifications would be visible to AT.
Note: there is a PR about this. It references the closed issue w3c/mathml#105.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the discussion from the 24/5/24 meeting, the linked menclose CSS polyfill, and PR w3c/mathml-core#24. Compare the proposal with the referenced closed issue w3c/mathml#105. Done would require a resolved MathML Core specification for menclose, including its notation and accessibility-tree implications.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- css, html
- Domain
- accessibility, web-dev
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100