Continuity of Ops >> Arrangements >> Reference other Web For All factors
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 84
- Forks
- 69
- Avg merge
- 14h 52m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
@plehegar , you asked me to file an issue on the Web for All factors in Continuity of Ops.
I originally included this issue in #68 Arrangements; https://github.com/w3c/Guide/issues/68#issue-583375004 , specifically: "Additionally, add a topical paragraph, either with the sub-head "Web For All" [...] I am guessing that there are I18N, privacy, and security considerations that people could be briefly reminded of here, which would favor a "Web for All" topic word."
Credit to @nitedog for the observation.
@svgeesus comment on privacy issues to be aware of on some platforms is one example of potentially relevant privacy considerations to mention, as it has been on the Chairs' list.
@swickr this overlaps a previous issue that is now closed, but opens a clearer issue so as not to miss this item.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the Continuity of Ops Arrangements section and the discussion in #68, then review the linked Web for All, internationalization, privacy, and security references in this issue. Done means the section contains a clearly scoped Web For All paragraph that references the relevant factors without missing the requested considerations.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100